And it might be a nuisance to delete all the synopsis sections this could be scripted or otherwise probably fastest done in an outliner either at the beginning or end of process. Other annotations can be added to the synopsis - tags etc in a different colour.Ĭolours won’t survive export to markdown for writing in Obsidian or other markdown editor. But a simple, quick, easy planning with a visual process suits me, and something I’d consider in the future. ![]() Not that I’d intend to do that in Workflowy. Text for the scene goes in the note to the scene itself. This expands the scene size in the kanban. Added a synopsis to planned scenes by adding an empty bullet to the scene, writing a synopsis in the note and then colouring the synopsis. Looks good very usable.Īnd discovered a planning trick. Quite a complex structure - Sections, Chapters, Passages/Scenes. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that helps you make an informed decision. 'Unlimited items' is the primary reason people pick Dynalist over the competition. I’ve been procrastinating by playing with Workflowy kanban. Dynalist, Checkvist, and Moo.do are probably your best bets out of the 10 options considered. I do not suggest bulk writing in one of the outliners as they have none of the usual helpful features.Many other programs that might form part of a common workflow use OPML - eg mindmappers, Scrivener - but I haven’t tested their limitations. I do not suggest bulk writing in one of the outliners as they have none of the usual helpful features, though Dynalist now has wordcount, but for smaller tasks they may be helpful.For example, the same line item, 'write my book,' can simultaneously be a to-do in a task list and the container for an entire. This sounds simple but makes WorkFlowy extremely powerful. The most important reason people chose Workflowy is: Any sublist can be viewed as a top-level list. This does transmit, but the syntax is wrong for markdown editors easily fixed with a global replace. Workflowy is ranked 8th while Dynalist is ranked 33rd. Workflowy has the ability to colour text.No problem for those used to using the Obsidian editor without looking at the Preview. Dynalist will display most text formatting correctly except italics (it has its own weird double underline syntax for italics) Workflowy won’t. I strongly suggest that any formatting written in Workflowy/Dynalist etc is done manually using markdown syntax - using their internal formatting does not transmit using OPML.I used Typora to do the conversions both ways, purely because that’s what is simplest for me (its underlying engine is Pandoc).Exporting such a bulleted list using OPML converted the bullets to headers again. I was a little surprised to find it displayed as a hierarchy of bullets with notes containing the text - just about perfect. md file (principally using WriteMonkey) with headings h1-h6 section levels, I thought it might be interesting to test a conversion to OPML and import into Workflowy and Dynalist. Having been experimenting in writing a book as a single. I discovered that it can work well and is especially useful for long complex documents. I’ve recently been investigating the personal utility of OPML as a common format in some of the programs I use.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |